您现在的位置: 洪啸音乐教育工作站 >> 文章中心 >> 音乐教学论文 >> 音乐教育硕士博士论文摘要专栏 >> 文章正文 |
|
||||||
黎锦晖儿童歌舞剧《麻雀与小孩》与《小小画家》的差异性比较 中英文摘要 | ||||||
作者:王倩 文章来源:洪啸音乐教育工作站 点击数: 更新时间:2008-2-26 | ||||||
--感谢华东师大艺术系硕士研究生徐进提供并整理该文资料-洪啸音乐教育工作站-- 山东师范大学 硕士论文 导师:刘再生 中文摘要 黎锦晖(1891—1967)是我国近代一位富于创造革新精神的音乐家。在由“学堂乐歌”时期向专业音乐创作时期转型的重要历史阶段,他以独树一帜的儿童歌舞音乐和“时代曲”创作开辟了一条中国平民音乐的道路。尤其在二十世纪20年代创作的儿童歌舞音乐作品,成为向少年儿童宣传新文化、普及国语拼音、进行美育教育的生动教材。这样的创作成就,在我国近代音乐历史上有着十分重要的意义。黎锦晖一生的音乐创作活动中,影响最广泛的是12部儿童歌舞剧。其中,《麻雀与小孩》是他第一部儿童歌舞剧作品;《小小画家》则是他最成功的一部儿童歌舞剧。众所周知,黎锦晖的儿童歌舞剧是我国歌剧艺术的雏形,音乐和戏剧是歌剧艺术最重要的两大元素。因此,对这两部作品进行差异性的比较,其意义在于了解中国早期“歌剧”的原始面貌以及黎锦晖在儿童歌舞剧创作中所走的道路。 本文力求从黎锦晖这两部儿童歌舞剧的情节、音乐、角色、舞台表演和段落结构的差异性比较中真实而全面地对黎锦晖儿童歌舞作品进行探讨与研究,在充分吸收了前人对黎锦晖及其作品的介绍与研究成果的基础上,进行挖掘一些新的值得研究的方面,通过这样的比较研究,使更多的人们认识儿童歌舞剧并非已经失去历史价值,尤其是从事音乐教育的工作者应该深刻地认识到儿童歌舞的美育价值,能把这份珍贵的文化遗产发扬光大,在今天的素质教育中有所借鉴与突破。 英文摘要 Lijinhui(1891—1967) is a neoteric creative and innovative musician in China. During the historical period of transformation from the“classroom songs”to professional music composing he developed a school of his own for Chinese folk music with his“children’s music for song and dance”and“era music”. Especially his composing of the children’s music for song and dance in 1920’s mainly played the role as the most vivid textbooks in publicizing new culture for children , popularizing mandarin’s phonetics and proceeding aesthetic education. All his achievements in this period are very instructive in Chinese neoteric musical history. There are twelve most widespreaded opera for children in his composing of his whole life.“sparrow and children”was his first opera for children and“young painter”was the most successful one. As everybody knows, his opera for children was the origin of Chinese opera. Music and play are two basic elements in opera. So, when comparing the difference in these two works we will know more about the origin of Chinese early stage opera and the roads he took in his composing of those opera for children. This article focuses on the research and discussion of the comparison of the plots, music, roles, stage performance and the differences of each section in these two operas for children composed by him. Based on the formal researcher’s instruction and study, this article concerned more about the new aspects for deeper study and made people realize that the opera for children did not lose the meaning of existence through these comparison and study. Especially the professional in musical education should understand more about the aesthetic education value of the opera for children and promote this treasured culture heritage and benefit from it in today’s quality education. DOI CNKI:CDMD:2.2007.013719 8 |
||||||
文章录入:风信子 责任编辑:风信子 | ||||||
【发表评论】【加入收藏】【告诉好友】【打印此文】【关闭窗口】 |
网友评论:(只显示最新10条。评论内容只代表网友观点,与本站立场无关!) | ||
| 设为首页 | 加入收藏 | 联系站长 | 友情链接 | 版权申明 | 管理登录 | |
转载或者转贴本站资料,必须注明出处并知会站长。如有著作权的疑问,请和站长联系。本站欢迎一切与本站栏目相符的投稿。投稿信箱9xx@163.com来稿必复。 站长:赵洪啸 |